Philopsphy paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Philopsphy paper - Essay ExampleThe concept of categorical commanding is deservingly considered to be the dominant in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. It states that a person should do something not because he wants to do this, but following the rule that is common for everybody and should be strictly followed. All imperatives are expressed with an ought, which indicates how an objective police of reason relates to a will that isnt constituted so as to be inescapably determined by itnamely, relating to it as a constraint. An imperative says that it would be good to do or to refrain from doing something, but it addresses this to a will that doesnt ceaselessly do x just because x is represented to it as good to do(Kant 18) Kant states that if a person allows himself/herself to set the principle that will be followed only if by him/her and not by the rest of the people, this person can be called immoral. Kant provides different examples to demonstrate how categorical imperative was derived. The most widespread example is a persons request for money that he/she is not going to give back, notwithstanding that the promise is given by him/her. Kant states that if all the people scupper promises, they promises would not exist any more as people would stop believing them. Thus, promises should not be low-spirited and there is a common law not to falling out the promises as this is not right. Here we meet the first reason why right is right and wrong is wrong. The actions fulfilled in accordance with the universal principles set in the society, which should be strictly followed by the people, are considered to be right and everything that contradicts this principle is wrong. Our actions should not be based on our desires, they should be implemented in accordance with the universal rule. The main thing is not to cause any harm to other people. Thus, if an action brings harm to people, as in our example, it cant become a universal law and should not be followed. O bviously the false promise isnt made careful by its merely extricating me from my present dif?culties I have to think about whether it will in the long run cause more trouble than it saves in the present Peoples loss of trust in me might be far more disadvantageous than the trouble I am forthwith trying to avoid, and it is hard to tell whether it mightnt be more prudent to act according to a universal maxim not ever to get through a promise that I dont intend to keep (Kant 11). The conclusion can be made from the example that promises should not be broken as this causes harm to people. Any break of promise can be considered to be immoral. According to Kant, there is a universal law and it is immoral to break it. 2. According to vocaliser, we must not act so as to turn over a major absorb for a minor interest. Explain why. Explain how this affects Singers views on the eating animals and use of them in experiments and his views on abortion and euthanasia. The philosophy of Peter Singler is very interesting and unique. According to Peter Singer, we should not sacrifice major interest to satisfy minor interest. Minor interest is the interest that may be ignored and we can easily do without its satisfaction. Major interest is more serious as if it is not satisfied it may cause a trouble. Single apply this statement to the issue of eating animals. He is against devour the flesh of animals as considers the