Imagery and Irony in Hawthornes The Scarlet Letter Essays -- Scarlet

Imagery and Ironyin The Scarlet Letter Nathaniel Hawthorne, the author of The Scarlet Letter, purposes a variety of literary techniques in order to spend a penny energy and invoke the interest of the reader. He creates the mood and the climax of the novel by using the techniques of imagery and irony. Yet, it is his use of symbolism that truly carries the novel. An abundance of symbolism appears in many different forms, adding interest to the novel. For instance, Hawthorne uses his characters, such as Pearl, as symbols It was the scarlet letter in another form, the scarlet letter endowed with life. (Ch. heptad pg. 103) Pearl is a symbol of the sin of Hester and Dimmesdale. She serves as a constant punishment and living conscience. In addition, Hawthorne uses lifelike occurrences such as light and evil as symbols by having Dimmesdale stand upon the scaffold only at night. Darkness, therefore, is a symbol of the concealment of sin, and light becomes a symbol of truth and accep tance of guilt. The use of light and dark occurs many times throughout the novel to place emphasis on the underlying morals. Furthermore, Hawthorne uses everyday objects, such as the brook in the forest, to serve as a symbol. Pearl refused to cross the brook and join her mother on the other side, making the brook a symbol of the leap between the two worlds of truth and deception. This natural setting is one of the most striking in the novel. By using symbolism in these three forms (characters, natural occurrence, and simple objects) Ha... ...tter it were so, than to hide a guilty heart through life. What can thy silence do for him, except it tempt him-yea, compel him, as it were-to add deceit to sin. (Ch. III pg. 73) One of the strengths in Hawthornes novel is his use of dramatic irony. To the townspeople, this passage appears to be a breathtaking speech that would suffer any sinner confess, when in truth, Dimmesdale is pleading with Hester to reveal his sin. The irony in the no vel establishes the strife and dismay of the climax. Hawthornes use of the three literary techniques of symbolism, imagery, and irony are what make his novel a masterpiece. By using these three techniques, he allows the reader to find inspiration and morality, visualize the plot, and become absorbed in the work itself.

Background Information about The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 :: Russian Japan History Foreign Affairs Essays

Background Information about The Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905By 1905, a revolution was immanent, Tsars power was to be challenged and the reasons for this are to be placed out here in this essay. Was the Tsars non-reformist attitude solely to blame or was the nature of Tsardom destined to destroy itself? We need to look at the foundations of the revolution in order to fully understand this and make an informed response to these questions. The foundations are laid out into five main parts, including short and long factors. The two main long-term factors being that the Tsar alienated many of the fleshes within Russia and his policy of non-reform led to repression. As these factors developed, other incidents became short-term factors. The failure in the Japanese War was a huge blow to Tsardom and undermined their ethos that Tsardom was the right regime for Russia and the political spring that came as the Tsar relaxed censorship brought an avalanche of criticism for Tsardom. Finall y, the abjection at Port Arthur triggered the protest at the Winter Palace, which developed into Bloody Sunday and was the birth of the revolution. Investigating the first of the long-term factors causing the revolution, it seemed necessary to go back to examine the structure of Tsarist Russia pre-1905 to get a fuller picture. This period posed a problem for Nicholas II. The regime itself reinforced any class divisions from the bureaucracy to the peasants and alienated them even further. As, the truth is Nicholas was never in touch with the common people. He never knew what it was like to worry where the next meal was culmination from. He never had to. He did not understand the way that Russia worked in practise. He could not, or would not, empathise with the peasants hardships of the land and his ideas of Russias troubles were laughable. Consequently, by 1905 he had take out his subjects, including even some of the gentry folk that had been so loyal to Tsardom in the past. They were a class in decline and it was partly due to the Tsars incompetence. Owing to Russias economic backwardness, the landowners found it almost impossible to farm for a profit. The gentry had no market for their produce, as their target market was rise penniless and thus could not afford to purchase crops from the landowners. The Tsar did little to rectify the situation and in fact took land off the gentry avocation the emancipation of the Serfs and issued bonds, which were effectively I.